have a look at that, and it goes for the other denominations as well.

Which coins were in circulation? It would be nice to know.
» Быстрый доступ к последнему сообщению
Hi Ole, the year lines in which “Proof” or "in Sets only" are not indicated are those of the coins that were put into circulation.
I agree with you and, when I still couldn't make modifications in the Andorra euros, I tried to write in those lines "Circulation (Madrid or Pessac Mint)", but my modification request was rejected.
If it's okay with the users, I can do it for all the values of euros in Andorra, no problem. Let's see what other users think. If there are no more opinions, I myself will make the modifications you propose.
Regards, Oscar
Hi Oscar,
OK, and by the way how do you distinguish between Pessac and Madrid mints, or is just depending on the years? It seems, you never have the two mints in the same year…..
Have fun
Ole
Hi Ole, all Euro coins of Andorra in even-numbered years are issued by the Madrid mint and those in odd-numbered years by the Pessac mint.
It would be nice to have a comments section in the Mint field to be able to put comments like this. I could also write this in the general comments section, what do you think?
oynbcn
It would be nice to have a comments section in the Mint field to be able to put comments like this.
I tried to get this added:
rsirian1
oynbcn
It would be nice to have a comments section in the Mint field to be able to put comments like this.
I tried to get this added:
That would have been ideal, but it is probably too simple, as good solutions normally are?
I believe, we can make a simple and stupid solution, until our top powers decide to accept the comments in the mint section, like this in the Comments section:
“The mint of Madrid mints the coins in even years and Pessac mints the coins in uneven years” or something like that? That would mean, that we could take the mints out of the year lines, which would already help.
What do you think?
Sjoelund
rsirian1
oynbcn
It would be nice to have a comments section in the Mint field to be able to put comments like this.
I tried to get this added:
That would have been ideal, but it is probably too simple, as good solutions normally are?
I believe, we can make a simple and stupid solution, until our top powers decide to accept the comments in the mint section, like this in the Comments section:
“The mint of Madrid mints the coins in even years and Pessac mints the coins in uneven years” or something like that? That would mean, that we could take the mints out of the year lines, which would already help.
What do you think?
Agree. I see no good reason to record comments on each year line that are the same on every year line (or in this case every even/odd year line). It's much easier and cleaner to add that in the comments which is what the guidelines requires,
Do not record comments that apply to all the lines. Record these in the generic comments field instead.
Of course, it would still be ideal to be able to use mint line comments to do it.
Odd is the word my small gray cells couldn't remember! Thanks.
Sjoelund
Odd is the word my small gray cells couldn't remember! Thanks.
I kind of guessed that. 😆
I've made a CR for the N#68386. Once it has been accepted or rejected, I'll go on or not!
Ole, of course I have accepted your request, it makes all the sense in the world. Before the comment I have added “Mint” in bold to give it more visibility.
When doing so, in the lines without comment (those in circulation), the comment in French appeared, so I had to also change the page in French. Can you see what you think and if the comment in French and what is written in this language in the lines of years is well written?
I await your opinions. If you see everything correct, I will do it myself in the rest of the Andorra Euro values.
Many thanks!!!
Hi Oscar,
I find that much better, so please go on.
Take care
Ole
Hi, done for all the euro coins of Andorra!!!
Please, change this topic to done 🙂
Используемый часовой пояс - UTC+2:00.
Текущее время - 06:24.