Help for identification.

10 сообщений • просмотрено 125 раз

» Быстрый доступ к последнему сообщению

Hello.

Please identify these coins.

 

 

The identification is right on the coin. It could be a replica but we wont know that for certain until you provide weight, diameter, and composition. In the meantime, it is attempting to represent itself as KM#377.8 (Go BR) Mintage unknown to Numista.

 

N#7394

harryg

The identification is right on the coin. It could be a replica but we wont know that for certain until you provide weight, diameter, and composition. In the meantime, it is attempting to represent itself as KM#377.8 (Go BR) Mintage unknown to Numista.

 

N#7394

The weight is shown in the photo: 26.88 grams. Diameter 38-39 mm

Looks good but cleaned

Kenny

- Verifying your Asian and British-territorial coins everyday with the best quality photos and the best information.

Check out my Facebook, Kenneth Gucyski.

KennyG

Looks good but cleaned

Thank you. And what kind of countermarks are these?

kazak

harryg

The identification is right on the coin. 

The weight is shown in the photo: 26.88 grams. Diameter 38-39 mm

Yes, I understand. Apparently you don't. What is the actual weight of the coin in your possession? Not what it claims to be or what it says on the coin, what does it actually weigh? You are welcome.

harryg

kazak

harryg

The identification is right on the coin. 

The weight is shown in the photo: 26.88 grams. Diameter 38-39 mm

Yes, I understand. Apparently you don't. What is the actual weight of the coin in your possession? Not what it claims to be or what it says on the coin, what does it actually weigh? You are welcome.

 

 

I'm sorry, I didn't understand. Among the posted photos is a photo of a coin on a scale.

 

Here is this photo

 

My concern was the very uneven wear on the Eagles wing feathers while the breast feathers (another high point) appears to have little wear at all. Yes, and as the other poster said, definitely cleaned. Chop marks are virtually untraceable to a single source but clearly  Mexican and Asian chop marks. Speculating here, but the Z could be from the Zacatecas region of Mexico for instance. They also were heavily circulated in other areas of central America so the chop marks could be from many places.

A few examples with chop marks:

 

 

harryg

My concern was the very uneven wear on the Eagles wing feathers while the breast feathers (another high point) appears to have little wear at all. Yes, and as the other poster said, definitely cleaned. Chop marks are virtually untraceable to a single source but clearly  Mexican and Asian chop marks. Speculating here, but the Z could be from the Zacatecas region of Mexico for instance. They also were heavily circulated in other areas of central America so the chop marks could be from many places.

Thanks for the help. Here are examples of coins that also have uneven wear marks. The wings are more worn than the eagle's chest.

 

https://www.ma-shops.com/cdma/item.php?id=879762

https://www.ebay.com/itm/234798289349

https://shop.yesterdayschange.com/products/mexcio-1883-cnam-culiacan-mint-cap-rays-8-reales-km-377-3-ngc-au-58

» Политика форума

Используемый часовой пояс - UTC+2:00.
Текущее время - 13:46.