Duplicate - Schilling - John II Casimir Vasa

Post is only about schillings with Lithuanian coat of arms. I do not have reference book for Polish ones.

N#119349

N#119345

Ujazdów mint page difference is year. Lettering variations exist in both as well as high volume of forgeries. Same treasurer mark. Maybe merge.

Emission numbers from https://en.numista.com/catalogue/catalogue.php?id=2576 in bottom table.

Ujazdovas = Ujazdów - two pages above

Oliva = Oliwa - one page in numista, if all pages are linked in Ujazdów page and there are no orphans.

Vilnius = Wilno - three pages in numista

Kaunas = Kowno - two pages in numista

Lietuvos Brasta = Brześć = Brest-Litovsk - two pages in numista

Marijenburgas = Malbork - one page

If person has coin from 1665-1666, they won't be able to distinguish between Wilno and Brześć. Coins are identical for the quality of standards in good olde days. Numista can use dedicated location for mint instead of title. "Brześć" alone points at two towns.

Kowno difference is in GFH and Kryszpin (https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kryszpin) coat of arms in reverse. Instead of HKPL used in Malbork.

Malbork difference is Georg fon Horn in obverse

Oliwa difference in Bialozoras (https://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bialozorai) coat of arms and year.

Who allowed TLB to mint those pages in Numista to fulfill his medieval crypto mining dreams?

Given the level of detail we already have, I'm not sure combining all to one type makes sense, but maybe one listing per mint …

But it would take a lot of work to retain the current amount of detail.

I will take a closer look.  

11 pages can be reduced to five by merging years and combining Wilno with Brest Litovsk. What differences Wolski found between Wilno and Brest Litovsk apart from giving them different numbers?

Ujazdov got 34 different variations in lettering/punctuation.

Oliwa got 22

Wilno/Brest Litovsk got more than one hundred variants.

Kowno got 23

Malbork got 5

Plus extra 50% coinage in forgeries.

Krauze did not bother to separate all that copper crypto and assigned one number to them all.

Given the ammount of information within both of these pages, I would not attempt to merge them without access to the catalogues about these coins.

As they clearly show varieties of a single coins, one big page could be enough in the future, if we use examples system on these coins, but transitioning to this would be great effort. I will close this for now.