Kingdom of Nawanagar --- new period [решено]

5 сообщений • просмотрено 40 раз

Это сообщения для: запрос на создание или изменение страны в каталоге

Статус: Сделано
Положительные голоса: 1
Отрицательные голоса: 0

Hello, 

@tdziemia the catolog is innacurate for “Ips”/IPS Nawanagar

 

from 1570 - 1812, Nawanagar was an indian kingdom, and from 1812 - 1949 Nawanagar was an princely state

 

Rulers to add:

 

 

Period to add:

1570 - 1812 Kingdom Of Nawanagar

ex:

1812 - 1949 Nawanagar princely state

Arnav
Статус изменён на Начато (tdziemia, 8 Фев 2026, 21:53)

I have begun this but need help with the rulers in part because of the “frozen date” practice. 

Note that our guidelines say this:

  • If the year shown on the coin is different from the year(s) when it was minted, select “No date” (ND) and enter the actual year(s) of minting in the two fields.   

So, for all of these “frozen date” types (possibly everything for Nawanagar?) we shuld be calling them ND and entering the date or date range when they are believed to have been struck.

 

Likewise, we should be using the ruling authority when they were struck.  If Muzzafar's name is used on a coin struck after 1583, we can put “in name of Muzzafar Shah III” in the title, but he is not a ruling authority.

 

Kingdom (1540-1812)

1561-1583  Muzaffar Shah (only for coins actually struck between AH 969-990).

1569-1608  Sataji Vibhaji   

 

Princely State 

1814-1820  Sataji II Lakhaji

1820-1852  Ranmalji Sataji II

1852-1895  Vibhaji II Ranmalji 

1895-1906  Jashwantsinhji Vibhaji II

 

I have added these last four, which I think are the ones applicable to the Princely State period.  Please let me know what you think is the best way to proceed for the earlier ones.  If we can identify coins to specific rulers I will add them; if we can't then I will add Kingdom just as a Period.

This is great, Just as I found while researching, the rulers are accurate, and from research they had classified them as three periods:

 

 

1. Kingdom / Early Independent Coins (1540 – late 1700s)

In this era, Nawanagar coins were "dump-style" (thick, irregularly shaped) and heavily imitated the coins of the Gujarat Sultanate (Muzaffar Shah III).

Key Identifier: Look for the name of Muzaffar Shah III in Persian script, but with the Nagari legend "Shri Jamji" added at the bottom.

The "Frozen" Date: Most silver Koris from this long period bear the frozen Hijri date 978 ($AH 978$), which corresponds to the year 1570. Even coins made in the 1700s often still show this date.

Symbols: A prominent Katar (dagger) is often visible on the reverse.

 

 

 

 

2. Protectorate / Transitional Phase (1812 – 1850s) (same as princely state, both under British scrutinizy)

After the Walker Treaty of 1807, Nawanagar came under British protection. While the coins still looked "traditional," the quality began to change.

Key Identifier: The coins are still hand-struck "dump" coins, but the calligraphy becomes more stylized (constant fine lines i.e. Dhinglo) and refined compared to the early 16th-century imitations.

Ruler Mention: During this time, they continued using the generic "Shri Jamji" (referring to the Jam Saheb) rather than specific names of individual rulers on most copper and silver units.

 

 

 

3. Princely State / Modern Era (1852 – 1948)

During the reigns of Jam Vibhaji and Jam Ranjitsinhji, the coinage became more modernized and eventually machine-struck.

Key Identifier: Specific names and Vikram Samvat (VS) dates appear.

Jam Vibhaji (1852–1894): You will see his name in Nagari: श्री जाम विबाजी (Shri Jam Vibhaji).

Machine-Struck: Later coins (post-1890s) are perfectly round with milled edges, looking like modern British Indian currency.

Denominations: You will see denominations clearly marked in Gujarati or Nagari, such as 3 Dokdo or 5 Kori.

Arnav

OK.  I think we ae good for the later period (after 1812).  I don't see any coins dated after c. 1900.  But if I am wrong, let me know and I can add more rulers.

 

For the earlier coins (before 1812) do we just want to use “Kingdom” as a period?  Or can we assign any coins to narower time periods?

yes a period isa good for smaller issuers

Arnav
Статус изменён на Сделано (tdziemia, 9 Фев 2026, 15:30)

» Политика форума

Используемый часовой пояс - UTC+2:00.
Текущее время - 17:53.