Merge these Monegasque listings?

3 сообщений
Recently I got one of these beautiful decimes:


That's when I found out that this coin has four Numista listings 8~ - two variants ("knot of wreath tied" and "knot of wreath untied") in two different metals (copper and cast brass). The cast brass listings have no pictures and the "knot untied - copper" page has poor photos, misinformation (the coin is listed as "non-circulating" despite the one in the photo clearly being worn nearly smooth), and a high index (92 compared to 62 for "knot tied - copper"). Shouldn't these pages just be merged? They don't really demonstrate what the difference between the two varieties are and I don't believe that minor design variants usually warrant their own page (we're talking about four unique pages for "KM97.1", "KM97.2", "KM97.1a" and "KM97.2a"!).

I'm bringing it up for discussion here because I notice that the French moderation is often quite precious about coin pages in the Franco-sphere, and I am not really used to modifying the non-visual content of pages in the main catalog so I am unsure of procedure.

Should these four pages be merged due to extreme similarity?

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces6370.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces24960.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces24959.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces24961.html
In my opinion they should. Only if there are good reasons there should be pages for each KM# x .1 or x.1a. Here one page is enough, the comment field can be used to describe the differences between them.
I'm not orange and also in other things I'm not a Donald at all. DonChori like Don Felipe or Doña María, por favor.
They should be merged with a line for each variant. With the way coin pages are now you can add notes and photos for variants I believe.

» Политика форума

Используемый часовой пояс - UTC+2:00.
Текущее время - 02:59.