Roman Coin

Hello friends. Maybe someone can help me with that coin. I tend to see this coin as a barbaric imitation in the name of Theodosius, given the crude aspect of the bust and the legends.

However, I was told the possibility of being a standard Theodosius II currency, like this:
http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/theodosius_II/RIC_1912.jpg
http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/theodosius_II/RIC_1912.txt
What is your opinion?

Цитата: "BOAK"​Hello friends. Maybe someone can help me with that coin. I tend to see this coin as a barbaric imitation in the name of Theodosius, given the crude aspect of the bust and the legends.
​
​However, I was told the possibility of being a standard Theodosius II currency, like this:
​http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/theodosius_II/RIC_1912.jpg
​http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/theodosius_II/RIC_1912.txt
​What is your opinion?

​Good afternoon, BOAK. It could be

https://www.vcoins.com/cn/stores/incitatus_coins/79/product/theodosius_i_ae4_salvs_reipvblicae_victory_dragging_captive_christogram_in_left_field/910246/Default.aspx

THEODOSIUS I AE4. SALVS REIPVBLICAE, Victory dragging captive, Christogram in left field

(Cyzicus mint), or an imitation of it.

Regards, Alex.

Alex, can you elaborate on the imitation aspect?

I can see AQ. Aquileia mint?

I can see the AQ clearly too. Here I have seen an example of this coin that is said to be from the Aquilea mint (But your mintmark is in better condition) :
https://www.ma-shops.de/zufahl/item.php?id=7797

In salus reipublicae coins the victory is usually after the "rei": salus rei-publicae, but in this the victory is separating after the r salusr- (rest not visible). That, but the crude bust, and the diminishing DNTHEODO caption make me believe to be imitative.

I tried some better pictures: