Duplicate listings (coins)

991 сообщений

» Быстрый доступ к последнему сообщению

Hi,

Wilhelmina, "Moeder des vaderlands", Liberation:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces45492.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces74744.html
Found a duplicate here, I let you decide which to keep and which to delete but second one seems to have better picture and more information.

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces58381.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces114873.html
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Цитата: "Victor (Ukraine)"​Hi,

​Wilhelmina, "Moeder des vaderlands", Liberation:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces45492.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces74744.html
​Done.
Цитата: "apuking"​Found a duplicate here, I let you decide which to keep and which to delete but second one seems to have better picture and more information.

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces58381.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces114873.html
​​Done.
These three coins are divided in two but are the same (same catalogue number, different mintmark in different year):

Finland 1 euro cent, KM# 98, Schön# 99
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces89.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces14011.html

Finland 2 euro cent, KM# 99, Schön# 100
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces90.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces13318.html

Finland 5 euro cent, KM# 100, Schön# 101
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces91.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces13319.html
Wanted & swap list (euro coins & world coins, exonumia and banknotes circulated) https://goo.gl/AQjfKp - I have euro & world CC coins for swap.
Цитата: "davidhs"​These three coins are divided in two but are the same (same catalogue number, different mintmark in different year):

​Finland 1 euro cent, KM# 98, Schön# 99
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces89.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces14011.html

​Finland 2 euro cent, KM# 99, Schön# 100
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces90.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces13318.html

​Finland 5 euro cent, KM# 100, Schön# 101
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces91.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces13319.html
​1st type/2nd type differentiation with different minting years given the addition of country identification on the national side of coins.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Referee for Spain, Iberia (ancient), Suebi Kingdom and Visigothic Kingdom
Цитата: "zegeri"​Please, delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces112781.html

​because is a duplicate of
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces40542.html

​Thank you
​It seems to me that the images here are better.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces112781.html

Edit: done.
Цитата: "Cyrillius"
Цитата: "zegeri"​Please, delete
​​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces112781.html
​​
​​because is a duplicate of
​​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces40542.html
​​
​​Thank you
​​It seems to me that the images here are better.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces112781.html
​Yes, but the other images are of a member and these come from an auction house.
Referee for Spain, Iberia (ancient), Suebi Kingdom and Visigothic Kingdom
1) 1 Broodkaart - Vooruit
2) Jeton carte de pain

It is necessary to remove the second coin sheet
Цитата: "Victor (Ukraine)"​1) 1 Broodkaart - Vooruit
​2) Jeton carte de pain

​It is necessary to remove the second coin sheet
​Done.
All done. Thanks
Archaeology student and coin and medal collector
Check out my Instagram account @Australian_Coin_Info
https://instagram.com/australian_coin_info/
Цитата: "Australian Coin Info"​Can the two year lines from the following coins that say "PLEASE MOVE" please be moved to the corresponding year lines of the coins underneath. Thanks

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces16860.html (move from)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces2733.html (move to)

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces16861.html (move from)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1722.html (move to)

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces16862.html (move from)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1727.html (move to)

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces16863.html (move from)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1721.html (move to)
​Done.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Please ignore.
I collect anything: If it's Italian or Italian states i collect it even more!
1 Penny Professor Holloway - London, England
1 Penny Professor Holloway, London England

½ Penny Professor Holloway - London, England
½ Penny Holloway, Professor - London England

These tokens were produced in London and used througout the colonies, including New Zealand. But all sources say that main circulation was in Australia. So I think we should remove these New Zealand coin sheets.

Regards, Victor
I checked the last 50 or so Auction results from Numismatic Auction houses and 100% placed these under Australia
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
I say that Australia - Ok, New Zealand - to remove.
As the referee for Australia I would recommend moving all entries of this token to the Colonial Australia catalog. While these tokens did circulate in both Colonial Australia and New Zealand, for obvious reasons they would have seen more circulation on the Australian continent. That is my reasoning for them to be in the Colonial Australia catalog.
Archaeology student and coin and medal collector
Check out my Instagram account @Australian_Coin_Info
https://instagram.com/australian_coin_info/
Please delete and move owner of this token https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces57280.html
to
here https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces107442.html
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Цитата: "apuking"​Please delete and move owner of this token https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces57280.html
​to
​here https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces107442.html
​Done.
DONE; Thanks.
Цитата: "nthn"​To delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces31747.html
​To keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces131198.html

​To delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces72564.html
​To keep (also delete unknown year line and move owners to 1751 if any): https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces92371.html
​Done.
Thanks
Quand l'Histoire et la Géographie se croisent sur nos pièces de monnaie ...
Цитата: "Ecapoe"​Hello,

​Could you deleted the second after transfer. Thanks.

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces131430.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces131544.html

​I think they are the same
​Done.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Referee for Spain, Iberia (ancient), Suebi Kingdom and Visigothic Kingdom
Цитата: "zegeri"​Please, delete https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces111670.html
​because is a duplicate of https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces40386.html
​Done.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Delete duplicate that I made.

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces132515.html
Цитата: "nthn"​Delete duplicate that I made.

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces132515.html
​Done.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces101087.html

&

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces105993.html
Цитата: "Kettti110"https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces101087.html

​&

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces105993.html
​Done, thank you.
Accidentally added the same coin twice.
Please delete one of the two:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces114795.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces132924.html

Thank you,

Paul
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Цитата: "apuking"​Accidentally added the same coin twice.
​Please delete one of the two:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces114795.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces132924.html

​Thank you,

​Paul
​Done.
The one duit coin of West Friesland dated 1769 is listed twice:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces98902.html
and
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces36196.html

Can you remove on of these?
Цитата: "thelet"​The one duit coin of West Friesland dated 1769 is listed twice:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces98902.html
​and
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces36196.html

​Can you remove on of these?
​Obviously, they have different inscriptions on the reverse.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces85177.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces68029.html
Are these the same coin and 1 should be removed?
Цитата: "ken6528"https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces85177.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces68029.html
​Are these the same coin and 1 should be removed?
​But there are different portraits ...

Yes, different portraits, and there are three versions ...
https://en.numista.com/forum/topic54916.html#p453828
Token collector [1600-1899] with some coins
George VI India 1/4 Anna, this is the original https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces18116.html and this is a poorly created duplicate https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces101949.html which needs deleting please.
Just because you can't see it ... doesn't mean it isn't there - Anon.

Former coin and banknote catalogue referee.
Цитата: "radrick007"​George VI India 1/4 Anna, this is the original https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces18116.html and this is a poorly created duplicate https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces101949.html which needs deleting please.
​Done.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Referee for Spain, Iberia (ancient), Suebi Kingdom and Visigothic Kingdom
Цитата: "zegeri"​Please, delete these records

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces110757.html duplicate of
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces110755.html

​and

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces110758.html duplicate of
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces110767.html

​Thank you
​Done.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces92217.html is a duplicate of https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces34217.html
Цитата: "anarchisto"https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces92217.html is a duplicate of https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces34217.html
​Cleared.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
I noticed that two coins in the Guyana catalogue are duplicates of pages that exist already in Demerara and Essequibo, and should be deleted:

DELETE
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces24519.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces24520.html

They are already listed with greater detail in D&E, with pictures and everything here:

DO NOT DELETE!
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces118074.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces118073.html

Besides, the 1801-1900 Krause catalogue lists them under D&E with KM#1 and KM#2 as well.

Thanks!
Цитата: "CassTaylor"​I noticed that two coins in the Guyana catalogue are duplicates of pages that exist already in Demerara and Essequibo, and should be deleted:

DELETE
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces24519.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces24520.html

​They are already listed with greater detail in D&E, with pictures and everything here:

DO NOT DELETE!
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces118074.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces118073.html

​Besides, the 1801-1900 Krause catalogue lists them under D&E with KM#1 and KM#2 as well.

​Thanks!
​Done.
Proper with Snap: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces124211.html
Please delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces116427.html
Majorly collects Coins of Republic India and British India.
My Blog on Indian Coins: https://numismaticscollections.blogspot.com
My small channel on YouTube @ https://www.youtube.com/NavaneethanRamanujam
Цитата: "Navaneethan"​Proper with Snap: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces124211.html
​Please delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces116427.html
​Done.
Цитата: "Cyrillius"
Цитата: "Navaneethan"​Proper with Snap: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces124211.html
​​Please delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces116427.html
​​Done.
​Thank you :)
Majorly collects Coins of Republic India and British India.
My Blog on Indian Coins: https://numismaticscollections.blogspot.com
My small channel on YouTube @ https://www.youtube.com/NavaneethanRamanujam
Thank you and happy collecting :)
Just because you can't see it ... doesn't mean it isn't there - Anon.

Former coin and banknote catalogue referee.
Цитата: "radrick007"​Hello and good morning, just found this duplicate pair in the UK Conders:

​Original (to keep): https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces53235.html

​Duplicate (to delete): https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces75856.html

​Would suggest the duplicate coin owners are added to the top line (DH#12) of the original page.

​Thank you and happy collecting :)
Done. :)
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
This is not a duplicate coin, but I am not sure where else to post it. Its title is "Coin to delete": https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces137247.html
Цитата: "Sulfur"​This is not a duplicate coin, but I am not sure where else to post it. Its title is "Coin to delete": https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces137247.html
​Ok, thank you.
British Virgin Islands:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces33893.html

Hardly any info and NRI of 100, so no member has this coin and you can easily delete it. It's the same as one of those four:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces96592.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces96590.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces96589.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces96591.html
Цитата: "Essor Prof"​British Virgin Islands:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces33893.html

​Hardly any info and NRI of 100, so no member has this coin and you can easily delete it. It's the same as one of those four:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces96592.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces96590.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces96589.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces96591.html
​Done.
(I like this coin! https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces96589.html)
Done!
Thank you, photo of the second was not corresponding to the catalogue reference numbers, it has now been changed.

Still we have a duplicate now.

Please keep
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces112583.html

and delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces108748.html
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Цитата: "apuking"​Thank you, photo of the second was not corresponding to the catalogue reference numbers, it has now been changed.

​Still we have a duplicate now.

​Please keep
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces112583.html

​and delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces108748.html
​Done.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Done. Thank you!
Цитата: "Sulfur"​Two coins from the Livonian Order managed to get added under the Archbishopric of Riga. I have a pending request to move one, but this one should be deleted: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces133332.html.

​(It is already listed here: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces47571.html)
​Done.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Hm... I found a few duplicates on this page:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/index.php?mode=simplifie&p=1&l=&r=1586+Riga&e=&d=&ca=3&no=&i=&v=&m=&a=&t=&dg=&w=&u=&f=&g=&c=&tb=y&tc=y&tn=y&tp=y&tt=y&te=y&cat=y

The three coins listed under the Duchy of Livonia are all fine, but the problem is with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth ones. The former was a territory of the latter, so any coins listed as "Ryga Mint" were issued for the Duchy of Livonia. A lot of the Polish-Lithuanian coins are also split by the Kopicki catalogue, and I believe each Kop number is for a different date, meaning there is a lot to correct. The seven Trojaks should be deleted (they are the same as the first 3 Gros coin), the Sezlag should be deleted (it is the same as the Schilling), and the Portugał ryski should be deleted (it is the same as the 10 Ducat piece). Everything else should be moved under the Duchy of Livonia

Actually, these 29 coins are all problem coins, since these are all Livonian:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/index.php?mode=simplifie&p=1&l=&r=%22Ryga+mint%22&e=&d=&ca=3&no=&i=&v=&m=&a=&t=&dg=&w=&u=&f=&g=&c=&tb=y&tc=y&tn=y&tp=y&tt=y&te=y&cat=y

I will try to sort out which to be deleted and which to moved...
That section was not as Kopicki-split as I remember, but different dates are still not on the same page. Here is everything:

Delete this (no pictures): https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces86425.html
Move this to the Duchy of Livonia (has pictures): https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces98103.html
-----
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces86426.html
Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces98948.html
-----
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces86428.html
Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces63453.html
-----
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces77366.html
Delete:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces99021.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces99022.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces99024.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces99025.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces63410.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces21072.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces99028.html
-----
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces86422.html
Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces99029.html
-----
Move to Livonia: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces99031.html
-----
Unsure (I am not sure if this date exists, and if it does, it might have to be merged with another page):
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces99030.html
-----
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces86423.html
Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces99032.html
-----
Keep (I own this coin!): https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces78799.html
Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces126485.html
-----
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces78800.html
Delete:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces136395.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces136396.html
-----
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces86400.html
Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces136397.html
-----
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces86405.html
Delete:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces44749.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces63409.html
-----
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces65317.html
Delete:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces63408.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces63407.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces44136.html
-----
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces77367.html
Delete:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces63406.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces63405.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces63404.html
-----
Unsure (it does not appear in the Livonian catalogue, but I am not sure what its denomination is):
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces98915.html
-----
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces86406.html
Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces98586.html
-----
Move to the Duchy of Livonia: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces98685.html


And that should be all of them. The names of the rulers on some Livonian coins are not English-a-fied, like the Polish-Lithuanian ones, and the denominations are not consistent. Neither is the spelling of Riga. But those are all separate issues.
Hello.
I'm sure you need to discuss this with a colleague-referee.
First:
All Polish collectors, all Polish catalogs, all Polish sites, auctions houses, even on foreign auction houses Riga coins from this period are mentioned as Polish Lithuanian Commonweath, this is a fact, so why numista wants to change history ?

https://coins.ha.com/itm/poland/raciborz/poland-riga-stephan-bathory-3-groszy-trojak-1586-au50-ngc-/a/231636-62333.s

https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=2520&lot=87

https://www.ma-shops.com/krogoll/item.php?id=21585&lang=en

https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=2155&lot=62

https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=1180&lot=32337


Second:
We have the same situation with coins minted during Russian Empire occupation, with coins minted in Warsaw (kopeks, they are not under Poland but under Russia:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces63934.html
or minted during occupation of Vien by Third Reich, they are under Third Reich:


Third:
If on coin there is Step D G REX PO M D L = the king of Poland and Dux of Lithuania it means no dux / king / or empire of Riga

Fourthly:
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monety_miejskie_Rygi_(1581%E2%80%931622)
Po przejęciu Rygi przez Stefana Batorego miejska mennica przystąpiła do zmiany stempli oraz podjęcia produkcji nowych monet, na podstawie obowiązujących w całej Rzeczypospolitej ordynacji menniczych opartych na grzywnie krakowskiej.

After the takeover of Riga by Stefan Batory, the city mint commenced the change of stamps and the production of new coins on the basis of the minting regulations applicable in the entire Polish Lithuanian Commonweath based on the Krakow fine.

Fifth:
seriously You would like to keep this ?
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces77367.html with no catalog numbers

and deleting my work from the most accurate catalog of Tadeusz Iger, with all existing variants:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces63406.html



I canot agree for wasting my job and changing history. You can leave your part in Livonia catalog, with comment "there is the same coin in Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth" and collectors will chose where to enter his / her coin at its own discretion. This is only solution.
(I am not sure how to do multiple quotes in one post, so I will just reply to each point separately.)

1) What about non Polish-Biased places? Of course, places centred around Latvia/Estonia would favour the coins in Riga, like Haljak Acutions: https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=1435&lot=184. Since Polish-Lithuania was in control, that link does mention Polish-Lithuania, but in the same way they mention Sweden on Swedish Livonian coins (Polish-Lithuanian control of Riga; Swedish control of Riga).

NGC/Krause is another source who lists these coins under Livonia: https://www.ngccoin.com/price-guide/world/livonia-schilling-km-5-1601-1620-cuid-1170198-duid-1450828

I am not sure if throwing links around helps because of how split these auction houses seem to be--we could throw an endless amount of links at each other--but here are three others:
https://www.coinarchives.com/w/lotviewer.php?LotID=2943415&AucID=2953&Lot=704&Val=bdd179e55382dc2a6fdd05b1a455e3ea
https://www.coinarchives.com/w/lotviewer.php?LotID=2964204&AucID=2999&Lot=89&Val=68bb7baf13f31396b815e91a23d1e005
https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=2246&lot=1056
 
2) I do not know enough about Russian history to comment about this, but with the designs Warsaw issued looking exactly like the ones Ekaterinburg did, I can see why they are listed under Russia.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/index.php?mode=simplifie&p=1&l=russia-empire&r=1850&e=russia-empire&d=&ca=3&no=&i=&v=&m=&a=&t=&dg=&w=&u=&f=&g=&c=&tb=y&tc=y&tn=y&tp=y&tt=y&te=y&cat=y
The ones from Polish-Lithuania and Riga had different designs; Riga's, for example, had their classical coat of arms (crossed keys).

3) If you take some of the coins from Swedish Livonia, it is in a similar way: CAROLVS D G REX SV; Carl XI, with God's grace, King of Sweden. The ruler of Sweden was the top person, and yet none of those coins are listed under Sweden. The Duchy of Livonia would be like a Polish-Lithuanian Livonia (or Riga).

4) I guess you and I interpret "On the basis of the minting regulations applicable in the entire [...]" differently. With Livonia/Riga being under control by the Polish-Lithuanians, they had to change their monetary system to match those who controlled them. They did the same during Swedish control. That way, local coins could circulate alongside the ones issued by the controller.

This link somewhat explains the change in the monetary system: http://www.oocities.org/eisters/polriga/polriga.html

5) More people have the first one checked off compared to the second, so I would say yes to deleting the page with less people. I do not think the same coin should exist in two different places, so if one is to go, it would take the least amount of work that way. And of course, the cataoluge numbers can always be transfered.
My Mistake,

please keep
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces114976.html
and delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces139714.html

Thanks,

Paul
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
(apuking, shh, done)
Hi, This is a duplicate in catalog:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces52130.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces61514.html

The information in first one is a little better, so please delete the second one.
Mintage date for both of them is incorrect. Year must be: 1370-1386 (in Persian calendar)

Thanks.(8
Цитата: "mrfane"​Hi, This is a duplicate in catalog:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces52130.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces61514.html

​The information in first one is a little better, so please delete the second one.
​Mintage date for both of them is incorrect. Year must be: 1370-1386 (in Persian calendar)

​Thanks.(8
​Hello.
Please check again. In the first page not all dates are listed. The pages differ in the KM# numbers.
(You can change the Gregorian date yourself (button D) )
This token:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces65711.html

is a misspelled duplicate of:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces33403.html

The first one should be deleted.
Цитата: "Jesse11"​This token:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces65711.html

​is a misspelled duplicate of:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces33403.html

​The first one should be deleted.
​Done, thank you.
Done
Essor Prof: done.
Dupe..... Netherlands Token: 1250th Anniversary of Westervoort

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces51718.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces59679.html
Цитата: "bbybugs"​Dupe..... Netherlands Token: 1250th Anniversary of Westervoort

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces51718.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces59679.html
No, they are not duplicates, it's "De koperen Hand" and "De gouden Hand".
Oh.....I see, mine is "De koperen Hand". Thanks
I think this is the same:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces73869.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces44328.html
Цитата: "alamir"​I think this is the same:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces73869.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces44328.html
​Done, thank you.
Are these just one coin?

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces2938.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces136918.html
Lets adopt the KISS philosophy, "Keep It Simple Sucker"
Цитата: "trvrhldr"​Are these just one coin?

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces2938.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces136918.html
​​Done, thank you.
Thank you very much!
Цитата: "Sulfur"​Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces141843.html
​Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces140476.html

​For some reason, I had the delete one listed as being a schilling, so I did not find it when I added the keep one. My apologies. z)
​Done.
Цитата: "Cyrillius"
Цитата: "mrfane"​Hi, This is a duplicate in catalog:
​​
​​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces52130.html
​​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces61514.html
​​
​​The information in first one is a little better, so please delete the second one.
​​Mintage date for both of them is incorrect. Year must be: 1370-1386 (in Persian calendar)
​​
​​Thanks.(8
​​Hello.
​Please check again. In the first page not all dates are listed. The pages differ in the KM# numbers.
​(You can change the Gregorian date yourself (button D) )
​Hi,
I searched for it (in Numismaster site) there is no such a coin as KM#B1264
and yes. year list in first coin is not correct. My fault.
Year list must be 1370-1386 (Persian calendar)
Цитата: "mrfane"
Цитата: "Cyrillius"

Цитата: "mrfane"​Hi, This is a duplicate in catalog:
​​​
​​​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces52130.html
​​​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces61514.html
​​​
​​​The information in first one is a little better, so please delete the second one.
​​​Mintage date for both of them is incorrect. Year must be: 1370-1386 (in Persian calendar)
​​​
​​​Thanks.(8
​​​Hello.
​​Please check again. In the first page not all dates are listed. The pages differ in the KM# numbers.
​​(You can change the Gregorian date yourself (button D) )
​​Hi,
​I searched for it (in Numismaster site) there is no such a coin as KM#B1264
​and yes. year list in first coin is not correct. My fault.
​Year list must be 1370-1386 (Persian calendar)
​Then I suggest first complete the first page, and then delete the second page.
Hello,
I think Gwalior km 143.1
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces37121.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces72601.html
is dublicted.
I think the coins should be merged.
regards
Peter
Цитата: "alamir"​Hello,
​I think Gwalior km 143.1
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces37121.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces72601.html
​is dublicted.
​I think the coins should be merged.
​regards
​Peter
​Hello.
Or another option is to divide by KM# 143.1 and KM# 143.2. I propose to ask the referee.
Цитата: "Cyrillius"
Цитата: "alamir"​Hello,
​​I think Gwalior km 143.1
​​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces37121.html
​​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces72601.html
​​is dublicted.
​​I think the coins should be merged.
​​regards
​​Peter
​​Hello.
​Or another option is to divide by KM# 143.1 and KM# 143.2. I propose to ask the referee.
​I talked to him:
"I can't delete a page, only catalog admins can do it. But i agree, ideally KM#143.1 should be merged with KM#143"
There is a second referee who can correctly combine them. ;)
Цитата: "Cyrillius"
Цитата: "mrfane"

Цитата: "Cyrillius"
​​

Цитата: "mrfane"​Hi, This is a duplicate in catalog:
​​​​
​​​​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces52130.html
​​​​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces61514.html
​​​​
​​​​The information in first one is a little better, so please delete the second one.
​​​​Mintage date for both of them is incorrect. Year must be: 1370-1386 (in Persian calendar)
​​​​
​​​​Thanks.(8
​​​​Hello.
​​​Please check again. In the first page not all dates are listed. The pages differ in the KM# numbers.
​​​(You can change the Gregorian date yourself (button D) )
​​​Hi,
​​I searched for it (in Numismaster site) there is no such a coin as KM#B1264
​​and yes. year list in first coin is not correct. My fault.
​​Year list must be 1370-1386 (Persian calendar)
​​Then I suggest first complete the first page, and then delete the second page.
​Done.
Thank you!
Please delete this coin:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces139788.html
it´s an copy of this coin without country:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces141683.html
Sulfur: done.
Alamir: done.
Was adding some coins to my collection and noticed this duplicate listing:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces79638.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces19007.html

It even has the same KM#, 591.
Цитата: "CassTaylor"​Was adding some coins to my collection and noticed this duplicate listing:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces79638.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces19007.html

​It even has the same KM#, 591.
​Hello.
The dates are different. I suggest you contact the referee.
Hello,
No they're not, the second link is just missing the ND and 1808 lines the first one does.

First (left) second (right)
Yes, both those Ottoman coins are the same. The year written on the coins is a frozen date, 1223, with a regnal year (in this case, 22 to 25). The pages are just formatted differently.

1223 is written on the coin, which does translate to 1808 in the Gregorian calendar, as the first page says. 1223 with regnal year 22 is 1829, 1223 with regnal year 23 is 1830, and so on (which is reflected in the comments).

On the second page, 1244 is written nowhere on the coin, but that is the date you need to get the brackets to say 1829.
 
This is how the pages look, looking at it like: date - (bracket date) - mint letter - comment
1223 - (1808) - 22 - 1829
1244 - (1829) - 22 - 1223
 
This is how the pages should both probably look:
1223 (1829) - 22 - No comment (unless you want the date shown in Arabic numerals, which could be beneficial).

I heard somewhere the referee might be able to manually change the dates in the brackets, but I remember seeing many coins not like that in the Ottoman Empire, so maybe that is not the case. Overall, the first page probably has the more correct format (as well as more information), but... it has the wrong pictures displayed. The ones it shows are of KM#599. Also, all these coins would have a regnal year, and I have never heard of nor seen a dateless one of these. Maybe those lines are there for really worn coins? I would think to delete those two lines, but I do not think I can make that call.

Anyways. :`
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces78829.html
Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces78828.html
@Sulfur
Thanks for typing all that, I wanted to type out an explanation but was too tired to do it earlier. :° First coin should be kept IMO.

Speaking of bracketed dates, this isn't a duplicate; there's a few coins in Egypt (and maybe a few other Islamic calendar countries) that have a Gregorian date on the coin, yet are still bracketed.

Example:https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces5592.html
No problem! :`

It might actually be more easy to search if the Gregorian date is in the brackets on those coins. In the advanced search, 1335 can be typed into "Year" and 1916 can be typed into "Gregorian date", and the same coin will come up in both searches.

The problem with Ottoman coins (and other coins that use regnal years) is that the system that converts Arabic dates into the Gregorian calendar does not take the regnal year into consideration (like this one: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces113400.html).

(Although, this topic should probably be in its own thread so the Duplicate Listings one will not stray off-topic. :°)
Цитата: "CassTaylor"
​Speaking of bracketed dates, this isn't a duplicate; there's a few coins in Egypt (and maybe a few other Islamic calendar countries) that have a Gregorian date on the coin, yet are still bracketed.

​Example:https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces5592.html
​Yeah, you're right, I made a new thread about it:
https://en.numista.com/forum/topic71234.html#p578806
Цитата: "CassTaylor"​Was adding some coins to my collection and noticed this duplicate listing:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces79638.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces19007.html

​It even has the same KM#, 591.
​OK, I wrote to both referees. Let them format the page and then we will delete the extra page. Thank you.
Please move owner of this https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces143144.html to here https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces15178.html and then delete the first as its a duplicate.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.

» Политика форума

Используемый часовой пояс - UTC+2:00.
Текущее время - 05:30.